(WALBE OGAK)
The viral Facebook video by MC Dan Ngas has sparked conversations across the political landscape, not because it contained sensational allegations, but because it delivered a simple message that is often ignored in Nigerian politics.
His advice to the so-called "data boys" and political foot soldiers was both timely and instructive: do not involve yourselves in political battles that your principal neither started nor authorized.
It was a reminder that political loyalty should never be mistaken for reckless aggression. Too often, supporters take it upon themselves to defend political leaders by launching personal attacks, spreading propaganda, and escalating tensions, even when the leaders they claim to represent have chosen restraint. Such conduct frequently damages the public image of those leaders more than it protects it.
The situation brings to mind a novel I have read more thirty times and still reading since my graduation from Government College Pankshin in 1994.
T.S. Eliot's famous play, Murder in the Cathedral. King Henry II's expression of frustration over Archbishop Thomas Becket was interpreted by his knights as an instruction. Acting on their own initiative, they murdered the Archbishop, believing they were serving their king's interests. History remembers not only the crime but also the danger of overzealous followers acting without explicit direction. The lesson remains relevant today: supporters who take political battles beyond the intentions of their principals often create crises that could have been avoided.
However, the responsibility does not rest solely on political followers. Politicians themselves must consciously guide their supporters and consistently promote responsible conduct. In today's digital age, they must also monitor the utterances and activities of those who speak in their name, particularly on social media. A careless post, an inflammatory comment, or a misleading narrative can quickly inflame passions, deepen divisions, and undermine the credibility of an entire political movement.
There is another important lesson for politicians who thrive on propaganda and personal attacks. Propaganda is much like throwing a ball against a wall. The harder you hurl it, the harder it rebounds. No individual or political group has a monopoly on mischief. Many people choose to exercise restraint, not because they lack the capacity to retaliate, but because they value decency, civility, and what is often described as "table manners" in public discourse.
That restraint, however, should never be mistaken for weakness. When persistently provoked, those who have remained silent may eventually respond, and the consequences can be far-reaching. Like dropping a stone into a still pond, a single provocative statement can generate ripples that spread across the entire political space. Depending on how it is handled, those ripples may remain calm or develop into waves of hostility capable of disrupting relationships, institutions, and public confidence.
Nigeria's democracy requires more than electoral victories; it demands political maturity. Leaders must lead responsibly, followers must act with discipline, and public debate must focus on ideas rather than insults. Political disagreements are inevitable in every democracy, but they should never descend into unnecessary hostility fuelled by propaganda, misinformation, and the actions of overzealous supporters.
MC Dan Ngas' message, therefore, deserves attention beyond the immediate political circumstances that inspired it. It is a timely reminder that in politics, as in life, wisdom often lies not in how loudly one fights, but in knowing when a fight is unnecessary. Responsible leadership and disciplined followership remain essential ingredients for a healthier political culture.
