In politics, actions are rarely forgotten. They are recorded in public memory, debated in markets, beer parlour and revisited when allegiances shift. The political journey of former federal lawmaker Musa Bagos presents Plateau citizens with one such moment of reflection.
During Governor Simon Lalong’s administration, Bagos stood firmly against a proposed ₦10 billion investment from Jaiz Bank intended for the rebuilding of the historic Terminus Market in Jos. He reportedly secured court injunctions to halt the project, alleging that the move was an attempt to sell Plateau’s heritage. The investment was framed in controversial terms, described in some quarters as “Islamic money,” and portrayed as politically and culturally sensitive.
At the time, his actions were seen by supporters as bold and protective — a defense of Plateau’s identity and assets. To them, Bagos acted as a watchdog, questioning transparency and raising concerns about long-term implications.
However, critics saw something else. They argued that the injunction stalled economic recovery, denied traders an opportunity for modern infrastructure, and politicized an investment that could have stimulated growth. They questioned whether the resistance was rooted in principle or in political rivalry.
Fast forward to today.
Bagos has defected to the All Progressives Congress (APC), the very party whose state administration he fiercely opposed. In announcing his defection, he described the APC as a party with sound ideology and workable plans to lift Nigerians out of poverty and insecurity. He framed his decision as being in the best interest of his people.
This development naturally raises questions.
If the APC was once portrayed as advancing policies harmful to Plateau’s interests, what has fundamentally changed? Has the party transformed — or has political calculation shifted? Was the opposition to the Jaiz Bank investment an ideological stand or a strategic maneuver within the broader contest for political relevance?
Party defections are not new in Nigeria’s political landscape. They are, in fact, common. Politicians frequently justify such moves as pragmatic decisions aimed at better serving their constituents. Yet, each defection carries the weight of past words and actions.
Patriotism in public service is not defined by party labels. It is measured by consistency of principle, courage of conviction, and tangible outcomes for the people. If Bagos acted to protect Plateau’s interests, history may vindicate him. If political ambition overshadowed public good, time will expose that as well.
History itself is not a poor teacher. Rather, citizens sometimes fail to examine it critically. The responsibility ultimately lies with voters — to remember, to question, and to evaluate leaders not by rhetoric alone but by impact.
As Plateau moves forward, the larger question remains: in the theatre of politics, where does conviction end and ambition begin?
Only time — and the judgment of the people — will answer.
And the media never forget.
Walbe OGAK
07036573313
