PLASU IN PARTNERSHIP WITH GERMAN TECHNICAL CORPORATION (GIZ) TO TRAIN STUDENTS ON SKILLS THAT WILL ENABLE GRADUATES EMPLOYABLE AND RELEVANT TO THEMSELVES AND THE SOCIETY.
Plateau State University Strengthens Partnership with Nigerian Police to Bolster Campus Security
ONE YEAR IN OFFICE: TIME TO ASK QUESTIONS
(Modest Thoughts with Ayuba, Yilgak'ha, May
30, 2024)
In Nigeria, One Year in Office (OYO) has become popular governance traditions. At every level, elected government officials and their associates hold events to reflect and report their achievements to their respective constituencies.
Observing, reflecting and reporting one's stewardship in government is good, especially, when the prime intention is to demonstrate accountability but, it is a bad one when the whole exercise turns out to be a mere political jamboree or playing to the gallery, a sort of.
Transparency and accountability are the hallmark of governance; the absence of these good governance index in any government is a glaring recipe for institutional corruption that has become a recurrent decimal in the governance system of developing countries like Nigeria.
On May 29, except states that have off-season governorship election, His Excellency, the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and Commander-in-Chief of the Arm Forces, Bola Ahmed Tinubu, GCFR and 30 out of the 36 governors of states clocked one year in office on May 29, 2024.
Since the return to democratic rule in 1999, the president and governors of states are being sworn-in on the same day, May 29, of every general election year until legal twists and dynamics that led to annulment of governorship mandates of the affected states introduced off-season elections.
Off season election means those elections conducted on a date(s) other than the ones fixed for general elections, be it presidential and governorship poll. States that are having off-season elections because of tribunal judgements are Bayelsa, Edo, Ekiti, Imo, Osun, and Zamfara (five from the Southern and one from the Northern parts of the country).
One year in office in Nigeria's political landscape is a buzzword. It is when elected government officials having stayed in office for a period of, at least, 365 days in office, dedicate time and resources to showcase their achievements to the public. It is a mad rush to prove the can-do-spirit of the elected official.
OYO has become a sustained practice but the fundament question to ask is this: What can election government officials with a tenure of four years, reasonably, achieve in one year? On the recurrent side public expenditure, something can be achieved within short time but on the capital side of it, i doubt. It is hard to achieve anything tangible in one year let alone in 100days which proponent of the First Hundred Days in Office (FHO) which is becoming another popular event will want the public to believe.
In conventional practice, performance evaluations are done based on three critical elements. The first, is the need to put in place well defined Key Performance Indices (KPIs); the second, is to determine the nature of the projects involved, that is, knowing whether the projects are recurrent or capital funded nature and, finally, established whether the projects are short-term (one year), medium term (2 to 4 years) or long-term (5 to 8 years) as the case may be.
The project time framework used in this exposition is hypothetical within the context of constitutional four years in office in the first instance and, another four in office if reelected as allowed by the Nigerian constitution and the Electoral Act 2023 as amended.
While recurrent expenditure-based projects are operated on short term basis (daily or week (wages), monthly (payment of salaries) or annual budget for renovations and part of capital projects); capital projects require huge capital outlay and their realisation take longer time. This means that one year in office is mostly rooted in politics of showmanship where political actors hyped on statements of intention of those in power.
During campaign, generally, political parties, politicians and candidates make promises to the electorates. It is on the basis of these promises that candidates are elected into various offices. The reality, however, is that most of the promises politicians make during the campaigns are bigger than what they can possibly achieve in one year. Bogus campaign promises cannot just translate into concrete achievements by merely restating them. Deliberate commitment and practical actions are required!
It is true that, unlike the statesman who always think of the next generation, the mind of a typical politician is always on the next election except otherwise refined. A genuine politician (statesman) who is committed to delivering enduring legacies to his constituents will never be in a haste to report literally superficial or whitewashed successes but, instead, takes time to work and score big cards that will be visible to all and can stand the test of time.
Truth be told, when a politician begins to rush into hyping and celebrating one year or 100 days in office, the bid is tailored towards securing the next possible mandate. In other words, one year or 100 days in office to a natural politician is the beginning of the politics of the next election!
Politics of the next election in the first year can be distractive. It will distract political office holders from focusing on the responsibilities of governance, especially, when praise singers and hypers become so loud praise singing and hyping spree towards reelection.
It is important to note that sometimes, the one year/100 days in office is a deliberate response to opposition elements who might not allow time for elected officials to settle down for real governance business. Holding opposing political views is good but not when this is taken out of proportion. Crash opposition or political critics often criticised just for the sake of it.
Most times, comments coming from members of the ruling party/those in government or their supporters are praised bias even if nothing notable has been achieved. On the other hand, comments emanating from the opposition are mostly criticisms even when something notable is achieved by the government. Understandably, these binary stand offs are rooted in politics interest. However, governance is not about political interest but welfare and security of the citizenry. Politics must not be played with the fibre of governance at all but objective service no matter what side of the divide one belongs.
Objectivity demands that government actions, at all times, should be scrutinised and criticised where criticism is necessary or applaud where commendation is appropriate. This is the kind of balance that can make a difference as far as politic and governance of sustained development are concerned.
A lot has happened as it affects the well-being of citizens in Nigeria and people in states. However, time allowance is required to make better and more objective assessment of those in power. In a four years tenure, better assessment can be done when a tenure goes half-way. That is not to say that nothing can be done in one year but whatever is done can hardly be capital intensive projects except those inherited and are at the verge of completion by predecessors.
At the moment, it may be right or wrong to say that some credible steps have been taken by elected government officials but, certainly, there is so much that is yet undone and requiring prompt and concentrated attention from government to make life bearable for the citizenry too. There are enough rooms for improvement to make Nigeria and its component units but no time to waste at all!
Instead of celebrating one year or 100 days in office, elected government officials are called upon to consider reviewing their four years tenure mid-way or towards the end of their tenure in office. They should use the occasion to render full account of their stewardship to the people they are serving or have served. This will make for better scrutiny by the people.
Tackling existential problems require haste; political promises or solutions are often overrated or amplified while the task of providing concrete governance-based solutions to societal problems in a democratic regime, do not come cheaply. Solving corporate problems require rapt attention to details and weighing the implication of all decisions to be made on behalf of the people. Therefore, the powers that be must be prepared to provide satisfactory explanation to people on whose behalf they make decisions (policies or laws).
When an elected official is doing well, he/she knows. Pretense can only be claimed as a strategy for mischief but those lacking in governance capacity yet willing to learn for better performance, will listen to wise counsels from objective critics who says it is wrong when something is actually wrong and go step(s) further to give alternative solution(s) that are better!
WORKS COMMISSIONER PARLEYS WITH KINSMEN
BOSAT DONATES CLASSROOM SEATS WORTH HUNDREDS OF THOUSAND NAIRA TO GOVERNMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE BUKURU
BOSAT Rejoices with Comrade Jibrin Bancir over his appointments
While describing the appointment
as a round peg in a round hole considering the training he got at his Alma
Mater Bukuru Science and Technical College, BUTECH which led the foundation for
his other educational, professional and public service attainment.
BOSAT equally appreciated the
President for his farsightedness in appointing people with tract records for
service delivery.
This is contain in a
Congratulatory Massage signed by the BOSAT National Publicity Secretary
Williams Gyang dated 16.6.2024.
The message read:-The National President of Bukuru Old
students Association Technical (BOSAT) Bldr Raphael Rume on behalf of the
National EXCO, Patrons and its entire BOSAT members both at home and in
diaspora, felicitate with one of its member, Comrade Jibrin Bancir, of set 87
on his well-deserved appointment as a board member of the Federal College of
Education, Gusau, by the President.
Bldr Raphael said the appointment is a testimony of his
efforts and contributions towards Education and humanity at large.
BOSAT is proud of you, wishing you the best with the hope
that you will represent BOSAT very well at that level.
SHIFTING ROLES AS BANE ON NIGERIA'S DEMOCRATIC JOURNEY

Democracy is
broad but at the centre of it are issues of leadership recruitment, the rule of
law which emphasises equality and fundamental human rights. Therefore, one
cannot be wrong to see democracy in terms of freedom of choice based on the
dictates of law and the superiority of majority decision.
This discourse
focuses on democracy in relations to constitutionalism, adherence to rules as
it affects leadership selection. Of all that matters in a democracy, periodic
election is key. However, electoral processes are best consummated through strict
adherence to regulatory provisions. That is why a country's Constitution and
Electoral Act are very important ground norms.
Today being June
12, Democracy is celebrated in Nigeria. Before now, the day was observed on May
29 until former President Muhammadu Buhari changed it in 2018. Since then, the
day has become a big day for National celebration as far as the history of
democracy of democracy in the country is concerned.
The
commemoration of the Day of Democracy is a period for sober reflection with MKO
Abiola of blessed memory at the centre of it. At a glance, it can be said that
the fallout of the annulment of the supposedly freest and fairest election which
produced the Late Chief as winner led to the spontaneous reaction from pro-democracy
groups, especially, the National Democratic Coalition (NADECO). The national
reaction led to the historic “stepping aside” of the then “Military President”
Ibrahim Badamasi Babagida (IBB) and the emergence of Earnest Shenekon’s led “Interim
National Government” (ING) and the eventual resignation of ‘the man in the
Mirror’. This was followed by the returned of military government under late
General Abacha who almost metamorphosed into a democratic president until death
snatched him out of the Seat of Power, the Aso Rock Villa before Abdulsalami
took over and led the country back to democratic rule on May 29, 1999 with former
President Olusegun Mathew Aremu Obasanjo kang charge for 8 years.
As can be seen, the
period between 1993 when the presidential election was annulled and the
returned of democracy on May 1999, a lot happened and in quick succession too. The
period was turbulent with so many twists and turns in the political space. During
the time, new political nomenclature like the ING or phrase like stepping aside
surfaced in the country before the invention and invocation of “Doctrine of
Necessity” which later followed under the transition era of former President Goodluck
Ebele Jonathan from Acting President to President, following the demise of the
then President Umaru Yar’ Adua of blessed memory on 5th May, 2010. This
history is very important as a way of appreciating the journey that led to the
birth of the Fourth Republic/current democratic dispensation.
Since the return
of democracy in 1999, May 29 has become handing over and taking over date
except for State with off-season elections due to election tribunals’ rulings
on governorship polls in those States. Be it May 29 or June 12, the fundamental
question that begs for prompt answer is whether or not Democracy Day should be
celebrated in Nigeria at all? This question is germane in view of the socio-economic
and political contradictions currently facing the country and its citizens. Irrespective
of what anybody can say, the reality is that most Nigerians are not smiling
under this democracy. Since 2019, Nigeria became the poverty capital of the
world after overtaking India. The country is battling multidimensional poverty
with over 63% of the citizens living in abject poverty occasioned by
unemployment, insecurity, policy failures, corruption, terminal diseases,
climate change, etc.
This idea that ‘the
worst democracy is better that best military regime’ has become a fairy tale. Democracy,
they say, is work in progress but it is grossly not working in Nigeria. The political
culture of the country seems to be in favour coercion if anything is to work at
all. Under democracy, for instance, Nigeria can hardly be restructured even
though the need for that is glaring.
How can a
country have states where majority of them cannot pay, at least, N62,000 minimum
wage that is not even enough to buy a bag of rice for its toiling citizens? How
can a country which cannot afford a decent living minimum wage build spatial accommodations
for its public officials (elective and appointive) with fat allowances to them?
What a visible case of inequality perpetrated in high places? Government
officials need decent houses to function, no doubt about it but the times are
hard to warrant any luxury for them now except if the narrative from government
that resources are grossly scarce is false or a mere excuse.
Democracy is supposed
to be an inclusive system. Being an inclusive system, democracy should deconstruct
inequality, equate opportunities and make human systems more responsive to the
needs of all. Democracy is a civilised and honourable system of politics that
serves as harbinger of hope for liberty and freedom. In other words, democracy
is about the rule of law that concerns the trinity of superiority of the law,
equality before the law and Fundamental Human Rights (FHRs) like the right to
life; the right to freedom of association and the right to freedom of choice. Democracy
is about good governance which is centred on transparency and accountability. Anything
outside these ideological frequencies is tantamount to tyranny and will not be desirable
in the system.
In some parts of the world, particularly, Africa
and Middle East, democracy is cultivated and nurtured carelessly. Most countries
within places ignore the fact that democracy and its cherishable dividends (fruits)
do not come by wishing thinking but practical commitment to its lofty ideals.
In Nigeria, for
instance, the reality of lawlessness, corruption and inequality and, the careless
manner in which these contradictions are fought is a pointer that the country’s
democracy has not matured yet. In other words, the existence of lawlessness, institutional
corruption and inequality have indicted Nigeria’s democratic credentials even
after 25 years of unbroken experience with the system.
The primary
responsibility of government is to ensure that the stability, security and
welfare of the citizenry is promptly and sustainably attained. No nation
strives and develops in an atmosphere of chaos and abject poverty. One of the potent
ways through which a country can achieve good governance is for its citizens to
respect and faithfully follow the dictates of extant laws and sound rules of
behaviour (ethics). In other words, constitutionalism, that is strict adherence
to rules must take precedence over lawlessness. Through rules, roles are
assigned to institutions and individuals in the polity (society).
When system
rules and processes are violated, there are fatal consequences. This lesson is
so loud a book titled, "People Like Us" written by Dominick Dunne, a
master storyteller.
In that book,
the author told his readers about the story of the struggles of a certain
Renthal Family whose ambition was to win acceptance in an elite society
characterised by Knowledge, wealth and ultimately power. The main characters Elias
and Ruby Renthal who left Cincinnati to build business empires in New York,
United Staes of America as well as Baily.
Elias and Ruby can
be likened to two politicians or two political parties contesting for an election.
Gus Bailey was a journalist whose primary responsibility was to observe and report
the cataclysms (catastrophic power plays) that determine who get what amongst
members of the ruling class. By schedule of duty, he can be likened to an Electoral
Umpire who ought to be independent and neutral in the discharge of his functions.
One of the most
outstanding features of the people in “People Like Us” was that they operated
their society based on detailed rules that were not followed to the latter. Gus
Bailey moved from his observatory, reporting or supervisory roles to be a power
player himself. This means there was a shift in role and the world of the society
referred to in the book never remained the same.
Shifting roles can
be described as situations whereby a person or group of people abandoned their
roles for other roles. It can also be seen as an unwelcomed deviation from a well-established
or acceptable ideological orientation or tradition.
In a democracy, periodic
election is a tradition which takes care leadership recruitment in the polity. The
credibility of the leadership selection process is the basic determinant of the
functionality and strength of the democratic system. Therefore, the conduct of free,
fair and credible election becomes a pivotal goal in every responsible
democracy.
In an ideal
electoral system, citizens/stakeholders play distinct roles. These roles include
that of electoral observers (civil society), news reporters (journalists), electoral
umpires (Independent Electoral Commission), impartial judges (tribunal judges),
partisan politicians (contestants) and electorates. If, however, an impartial
arbiter (observers, journalists, INEC or tribunal judges), directly or
indirectly, meddled into political ding dongs or vice versa, then, there will
be real problem. The electoral processes will be badly compromised with its
attendant negative consequences. This is squarely the bane of Nigerian’s democracy
within the context of its leadership recruitment process.
Gus Bailey, the observer,
enjoyed the trust of the political actors he was reporting but, having being armed
with their secret strategies, he decided to be a player as well. Morally, his
action was wrong but a typical politician will tell you there is no morality in
the game of politics.
The Gus’ scenario
has become a recurrent decimal in Nigeria's democratic enterprise or practice.
The country's political system cannot be trusted because our rules of
engagements have been betrayed in many ways than one and frequently too. There are
always reasons to suspect the sincerity of the moves of every political players
and those superintending over our electoral processes.
Nigeria celebrated its 25th Democracy Day yesterday.
The celebration was the Silver Jubilee of the country’s democracy. It can be
said that so much effort has been invested in Nigeria’s democracy but so much
is still left undone. With discipline and dedication to the ideals of democracy,
the next 25 years will be eventful for the common good. Happy Democracy Day Nigerians!
GRASSROOTS NEWS
BOSAT Members from Pankshin North Declare Support for Bldr. Raphael Rume“A Vote for Progress, A Vote for True Leadership
The Like Minds of Bukuru Old Students Association Technical (BOSAT) from Pankshin North Constituency have unanimousl...
-
TEXT OF WORLD PRESS CONFERENCE ON THE PRESENT STATE OF INSECURITY IN PLATEAU STATE PRESENTED BY PLATEAU STATE HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY ON 27th AUGU...
-
WORLD PRESS CONFERENCE BY ELDERS AND STAKEHOLDERS OF PANKSHIN LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA IN RESPONSE TO THE PLATEAU STATE HOUSE OF ...
-
A TRIBUTE IN HONOUR OF COMMANDANT/CIS, DR. MRS. NGUNAN TAR Commandant/Comptroller Immigration Service (CIS) Ngunan Tar retired f...
-
By Johnson Paul Former Plateau State PDP state Chairman and one-time gubernatorial candidate Haruna Dabin and 11 other persons were arrested...
-
In a major cabinet reshuffle, Plateau State Governor, His Excellency Barrister Caleb Mutfwang, has sacked five commissioners and ...